<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debate is bible word of god-pt(04-20) Wesam Abd Allah vs. John Rankin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://assumptionworlds.com/uncategorized/debate-is-bible-word-of-god-pt04-20-wesam-abd-allah-vs-john-rankin/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://assumptionworlds.com/uncategorized/debate-is-bible-word-of-god-pt04-20-wesam-abd-allah-vs-john-rankin</link>
	<description>Assumption Worlds - 28th World Universities Debating Championship</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yahia</title>
		<link>http://assumptionworlds.com/uncategorized/debate-is-bible-word-of-god-pt04-20-wesam-abd-allah-vs-john-rankin#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://assumptionworlds.com/uncategorized/debate-is-bible-word-of-god-pt04-20-wesam-abd-allah-vs-john-rankin#comment-126</guid>
		<description>this kind of Difference between the bibles


What is the Difference Between Protestant and Catholic Bibles?


The Old Testament

The First Christian Bible
At the time the Christian Bible was being formed, a Greek translation of Jewish Scripture, the Septuagint, was in common use and Christians adopted it as the Old Testament of the Christian Bible. However, around 100 A.D., Jewish rabbis revised their Scripture and established an official canon of Judaism which excluded some portions of the Greek Septuagint. The material excluded was a group of 15 late Jewish books, written during the period 170 B.C. to 70 A.D., that were not found in Hebrew versions of the Jewish Scripture. Christians did not follow the revisions of Judaism and continued to use the text of the Septuagint as the Old Testament.

Protestant Bibles
In the 1500s, Protestant leaders decided to organize the Old Testament material according to the official canon of Judaism rather than the Septuagint. They moved the Old Testament material which was not in the Jewish canon into a separate section of the Bible called the Apocrypha. So, Protestant Bibles then included all the same material as the earlier Bible, but it was divided into two sections: the Old Testament and the Apocrypha. Protestant Bibles included the Apocrypha until the mid 1800s, and the King James Version was originally published with the Apocrypha. However, the books of the Apocrypha were considered less important, and the Apocrypha was eventually dropped from most Protestant editions.

Catholic and Orthodox Bibles
The Roman Catholic and Orthodox Churches did not follow the Protestant revisions, and they continue to base their Old Testament on the Septuagint. The result is that these versions of the the Bible have more Old Testament books than most Protestant versions. Catholic Old Testaments include 1st and 2nd Maccabees, Baruch, Tobit, Judith, The Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach (Ecclesiasticus), additions to Esther, and the stories of Susanna and Bel and the Dragon which are included in Daniel. Orthodox Old Testaments include these plus 1st and 2nd Esdras, Prayer of Manasseh, Psalm 151 and 3rd Maccabees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this kind of Difference between the bibles</p>
<p>What is the Difference Between Protestant and Catholic Bibles?</p>
<p>The Old Testament</p>
<p>The First Christian Bible<br />
At the time the Christian Bible was being formed, a Greek translation of Jewish Scripture, the Septuagint, was in common use and Christians adopted it as the Old Testament of the Christian Bible. However, around 100 A.D., Jewish rabbis revised their Scripture and established an official canon of Judaism which excluded some portions of the Greek Septuagint. The material excluded was a group of 15 late Jewish books, written during the period 170 B.C. to 70 A.D., that were not found in Hebrew versions of the Jewish Scripture. Christians did not follow the revisions of Judaism and continued to use the text of the Septuagint as the Old Testament.</p>
<p>Protestant Bibles<br />
In the 1500s, Protestant leaders decided to organize the Old Testament material according to the official canon of Judaism rather than the Septuagint. They moved the Old Testament material which was not in the Jewish canon into a separate section of the Bible called the Apocrypha. So, Protestant Bibles then included all the same material as the earlier Bible, but it was divided into two sections: the Old Testament and the Apocrypha. Protestant Bibles included the Apocrypha until the mid 1800s, and the King James Version was originally published with the Apocrypha. However, the books of the Apocrypha were considered less important, and the Apocrypha was eventually dropped from most Protestant editions.</p>
<p>Catholic and Orthodox Bibles<br />
The Roman Catholic and Orthodox Churches did not follow the Protestant revisions, and they continue to base their Old Testament on the Septuagint. The result is that these versions of the the Bible have more Old Testament books than most Protestant versions. Catholic Old Testaments include 1st and 2nd Maccabees, Baruch, Tobit, Judith, The Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach (Ecclesiasticus), additions to Esther, and the stories of Susanna and Bel and the Dragon which are included in Daniel. Orthodox Old Testaments include these plus 1st and 2nd Esdras, Prayer of Manasseh, Psalm 151 and 3rd Maccabees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJO17</title>
		<link>http://assumptionworlds.com/uncategorized/debate-is-bible-word-of-god-pt04-20-wesam-abd-allah-vs-john-rankin#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>DJO17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://assumptionworlds.com/uncategorized/debate-is-bible-word-of-god-pt04-20-wesam-abd-allah-vs-john-rankin#comment-107</guid>
		<description>@Norred1432:
why catholics, in them bible are 72 books and in bible Protestants are 66 books ... ????* Please Read Genesis 1 : 24-27 and Genesis 2 : 7-19.!!! too, Matthew 1 : 16 and Luke 3 : 23 !!! you want mor? ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Norred1432:<br />
why catholics, in them bible are 72 books and in bible Protestants are 66 books &#8230; ????* Please Read Genesis 1 : 24-27 and Genesis 2 : 7-19.!!! too, Matthew 1 : 16 and Luke 3 : 23 !!! you want mor? &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: جمعان احمد</title>
		<link>http://assumptionworlds.com/uncategorized/debate-is-bible-word-of-god-pt04-20-wesam-abd-allah-vs-john-rankin#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>جمعان احمد</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://assumptionworlds.com/uncategorized/debate-is-bible-word-of-god-pt04-20-wesam-abd-allah-vs-john-rankin#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Norred1432  : R U kiding me?
look at your bible and tell me which version ist?
king jems ist?

does God send his word with King Jems name at the side of the book????
by the way , who is the father for Jessus?serch your bible to fined  the answer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norred1432  : R U kiding me?<br />
look at your bible and tell me which version ist?<br />
king jems ist?</p>
<p>does God send his word with King Jems name at the side of the book????<br />
by the way , who is the father for Jessus?serch your bible to fined  the answer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashrafalarab</title>
		<link>http://assumptionworlds.com/uncategorized/debate-is-bible-word-of-god-pt04-20-wesam-abd-allah-vs-john-rankin#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>ashrafalarab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://assumptionworlds.com/uncategorized/debate-is-bible-word-of-god-pt04-20-wesam-abd-allah-vs-john-rankin#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Not only what was mentioned in the debate, but also it was Scientifically verified that the bible has more than 500.000 contradictions on its pages....
if it is really the word of God it could never show such gigantic number of contradictions with modern Science which is created by the same God!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only what was mentioned in the debate, but also it was Scientifically verified that the bible has more than 500.000 contradictions on its pages&#8230;.<br />
if it is really the word of God it could never show such gigantic number of contradictions with modern Science which is created by the same God!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mohamed5167</title>
		<link>http://assumptionworlds.com/uncategorized/debate-is-bible-word-of-god-pt04-20-wesam-abd-allah-vs-john-rankin#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>mohamed5167</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://assumptionworlds.com/uncategorized/debate-is-bible-word-of-god-pt04-20-wesam-abd-allah-vs-john-rankin#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Dear Brother Wesam
God Protect You</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Brother Wesam<br />
God Protect You</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar</title>
		<link>http://assumptionworlds.com/uncategorized/debate-is-bible-word-of-god-pt04-20-wesam-abd-allah-vs-john-rankin#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://assumptionworlds.com/uncategorized/debate-is-bible-word-of-god-pt04-20-wesam-abd-allah-vs-john-rankin#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Wesam Abdullah is one of the most stupid figure in Paltalk, I have heard him many times , he's such a filthy liar , besides his english is very worse... I have no respect to him or any other terrorist .... Omar , Palestine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wesam Abdullah is one of the most stupid figure in Paltalk, I have heard him many times , he&#8217;s such a filthy liar , besides his english is very worse&#8230; I have no respect to him or any other terrorist &#8230;. Omar , Palestine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ra7bani</title>
		<link>http://assumptionworlds.com/uncategorized/debate-is-bible-word-of-god-pt04-20-wesam-abd-allah-vs-john-rankin#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Ra7bani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://assumptionworlds.com/uncategorized/debate-is-bible-word-of-god-pt04-20-wesam-abd-allah-vs-john-rankin#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Hi Norred1432!!
It seems that your knowledge about christianity is very limited. Plz visit the website of the sheikh:
http://muslimchristiandialogue.com/

You'll find the contradictions, errors, etc. in the bible.

Greetings my friend!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Norred1432!!<br />
It seems that your knowledge about christianity is very limited. Plz visit the website of the sheikh:<br />
<a href="http://muslimchristiandialogue.com/" rel="nofollow">http://muslimchristiandialogue.com/</a></p>
<p>You&#8217;ll find the contradictions, errors, etc. in the bible.</p>
<p>Greetings my friend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: love jesus &#38; mohammed</title>
		<link>http://assumptionworlds.com/uncategorized/debate-is-bible-word-of-god-pt04-20-wesam-abd-allah-vs-john-rankin#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>love jesus &#38; mohammed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://assumptionworlds.com/uncategorized/debate-is-bible-word-of-god-pt04-20-wesam-abd-allah-vs-john-rankin#comment-90</guid>
		<description>yeah , Norred1432
you hate it , ok
but it is the fact , it is the truth 
see that book and you will know that there are many diffrent versions , not translations as they claimed
http://www.jamaat.net/bible/BibleIntro.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah , Norred1432<br />
you hate it , ok<br />
but it is the fact , it is the truth<br />
see that book and you will know that there are many diffrent versions , not translations as they claimed<br />
<a href="http://www.jamaat.net/bible/BibleIntro.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.jamaat.net/bible/BibleIntro.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hala</title>
		<link>http://assumptionworlds.com/uncategorized/debate-is-bible-word-of-god-pt04-20-wesam-abd-allah-vs-john-rankin#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>hala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://assumptionworlds.com/uncategorized/debate-is-bible-word-of-god-pt04-20-wesam-abd-allah-vs-john-rankin#comment-89</guid>
		<description>to Norred1432
you hate it ! but you can not deny that it is true</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to Norred1432<br />
you hate it ! but you can not deny that it is true</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suleimen</title>
		<link>http://assumptionworlds.com/uncategorized/debate-is-bible-word-of-god-pt04-20-wesam-abd-allah-vs-john-rankin#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>suleimen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://assumptionworlds.com/uncategorized/debate-is-bible-word-of-god-pt04-20-wesam-abd-allah-vs-john-rankin#comment-88</guid>
		<description>To Norred1432
if you want to hear the contradictions on the many bibles that Christians believe in please stop by this room “oJJl Muslim Christian Dialogue oJJl” In Paltalk and you will get ACTUAL proof from the bible.
to give you a taste... here are couple of them:
1== 
2SA 6:23 Therefore Michal the daughter of Saul had no child unto the day of her death.

2SA 21:8 But the king took the two sons of Rizpah the daughter of Aiah, whom she bare unto Saul, Armoni and Mephibosheth; and the five sons of Michal the daughter of Saul, whom she brought up for Adriel the son of Barzillai the Meholathite.
which one is correct???

2====  the question is When did Baasha die??? 

1KI 16:6-8 26th year of the reign of Asa

2CH 16:1 36th year of the reign of Asa
TWO completely different dates, in fact there are 10 years difference between the two dates, which one are we supposed to believe???
is the bible the word of God???can you prove it??
I hope to see you soon in paltalk so we can discuss these issues.
                           Suleimen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Norred1432<br />
if you want to hear the contradictions on the many bibles that Christians believe in please stop by this room “oJJl Muslim Christian Dialogue oJJl” In Paltalk and you will get ACTUAL proof from the bible.<br />
to give you a taste&#8230; here are couple of them:<br />
1==<br />
2SA 6:23 Therefore Michal the daughter of Saul had no child unto the day of her death.</p>
<p>2SA 21:8 But the king took the two sons of Rizpah the daughter of Aiah, whom she bare unto Saul, Armoni and Mephibosheth; and the five sons of Michal the daughter of Saul, whom she brought up for Adriel the son of Barzillai the Meholathite.<br />
which one is correct???</p>
<p>2====  the question is When did Baasha die??? </p>
<p>1KI 16:6-8 26th year of the reign of Asa</p>
<p>2CH 16:1 36th year of the reign of Asa<br />
TWO completely different dates, in fact there are 10 years difference between the two dates, which one are we supposed to believe???<br />
is the bible the word of God???can you prove it??<br />
I hope to see you soon in paltalk so we can discuss these issues.<br />
                           Suleimen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
